<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USA: A Plan B for World Cup 2010?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yankssoccer.com/usa-a-plan-b-for-world-cup-2010/52/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yankssoccer.com/usa-a-plan-b-for-world-cup-2010/52/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to Everything American Soccer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:24:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Zeger</title>
		<link>http://yankssoccer.com/usa-a-plan-b-for-world-cup-2010/52/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Zeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankssoccer.com/?p=52#comment-115</guid>
		<description>no USA all the way or England.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no USA all the way or England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mljohn1992</title>
		<link>http://yankssoccer.com/usa-a-plan-b-for-world-cup-2010/52/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>mljohn1992</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankssoccer.com/?p=52#comment-114</guid>
		<description>My bad. It wasn&#039;t a bad thought though, was it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad. It wasn&#8217;t a bad thought though, was it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Zeger</title>
		<link>http://yankssoccer.com/usa-a-plan-b-for-world-cup-2010/52/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Zeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankssoccer.com/?p=52#comment-113</guid>
		<description>thanks mljoh1992 for being stupid.  Brazil is getting World Cup 2014.  Sorry mljohn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks mljoh1992 for being stupid.  Brazil is getting World Cup 2014.  Sorry mljohn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mljohn1992</title>
		<link>http://yankssoccer.com/usa-a-plan-b-for-world-cup-2010/52/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>mljohn1992</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankssoccer.com/?p=52#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Well, Antarctica is out for obvious reasons, Africa might be out, Asia can&#039;t do it because of the olympics, what about South America? Maybe Brazil or another country in South America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Antarctica is out for obvious reasons, Africa might be out, Asia can&#8217;t do it because of the olympics, what about South America? Maybe Brazil or another country in South America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Zeger</title>
		<link>http://yankssoccer.com/usa-a-plan-b-for-world-cup-2010/52/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Zeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankssoccer.com/?p=52#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Spain could be one, I didn&#039;t think about them.  I think though, that Blatter will be hesitant to go to Europe unless its England, becasue they had it in 98 and 06.  Australia is a long shot i agree, so I think the two most viable options are England and the US.  We should play a game of basketball to see who gets it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spain could be one, I didn&#8217;t think about them.  I think though, that Blatter will be hesitant to go to Europe unless its England, becasue they had it in 98 and 06.  Australia is a long shot i agree, so I think the two most viable options are England and the US.  We should play a game of basketball to see who gets it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RL Bays</title>
		<link>http://yankssoccer.com/usa-a-plan-b-for-world-cup-2010/52/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>RL Bays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankssoccer.com/?p=52#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking the three alternatives are England, Spain, and the US - and I have absolutely no basis for this whatsoever.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if Spain is at the top of the list based on their performance in the Euro&#039;s - the nation will be riding high.  I don&#039;t think the Aussie&#039;s will get it any time soon - they have a lot of large AFL stadiums but I&#039;m not sure how easily those would convert to proper football stadiums (they are cricket ovals).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking the three alternatives are England, Spain, and the US &#8211; and I have absolutely no basis for this whatsoever.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Spain is at the top of the list based on their performance in the Euro&#8217;s &#8211; the nation will be riding high.  I don&#8217;t think the Aussie&#8217;s will get it any time soon &#8211; they have a lot of large AFL stadiums but I&#8217;m not sure how easily those would convert to proper football stadiums (they are cricket ovals).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

